O
Hagerstown
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Burkholder/McDade annexation

Hagerstown

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (9)Concerned (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
18
Last 30 days
18

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.

Public comments (30)

OpposedRenee BergenOct 27, 2026

Called the developer's handout biased, questioned its claims, and raised light pollution and wildlife impacts.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:29:48 →
OpposedMonica WorkmanOct 27, 2026

Warned the annexation could be a way around the county's data center moratorium and raised concerns about energy costs, water, noise, and diesel generator pollution.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 1:43:10 →
OpposedMatthew DunnOct 27, 2026

Asked the council to oppose the annexation, saying citizens were kept in the dark and should know the end user first; wants the area to stay rural.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 1:47:36 →
ConcernedMichael McDonaldOct 27, 2026

Presented eleven specific protections — undergrounding power lines, noise limits, buffers, dark-sky lighting, impact studies — and asked the council to make them enforceable before approving annexation.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 1:49:36 →
OpposedErica AranaOct 27, 2026

Asked the council whose interests they represent, urging them to genuinely weigh community opposition over corporate incentives.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 1:53:37 →
OpposedKeely NewbauerOct 27, 2026

Said the county's water plan is 17 years old and asked the council to table any vote until the 2027 water study is done.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 1:56:33 →
OpposedJudy ZubeOct 27, 2026

Said the applicant would request 15% of Hagerstown's entire water allocation, urged proportional impact fees, and asked for a two-year city moratorium on data center applications.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:00:30 →
SupportivePaul FryeOct 27, 2026

Spoke for the Chamber of Commerce in support, saying it grows the tax base without adding school costs — but urged due diligence on infrastructure costs.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:04:20 →
SupportiveBrian AmbroseOct 27, 2026

Union business agent urged support for the jobs and apprenticeship opportunities the project would create for working families.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:05:45 →
ConcernedGarrett PittsOct 27, 2026

A nearby first-time homeowner cited research showing ~7% property value drops near data centers and asked for written use clarifications and an independent property-value impact study.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:08:57 →
ConcernedBianca PierreOct 27, 2026

Said residents feel forced to choose between a data center and killing growth, questioned local job eligibility, and demanded enforceable, verified protections.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:12:26 →
SupportiveAva MazioOct 27, 2026

A young union plumber who has built data centers in Frederick spoke in support, describing financial stability, benefits, and modern closed-loop cooling technology.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:16:03 →
OpposedJaden HessOct 27, 2026

Warned against sacrificing farmland, water, and rural character, and urged a no vote on the annexation.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:19:24 →
OpposedJosh PeckOct 27, 2026

Lives across from the site on a private well; asked for a localized groundwater drawdown study and legally binding closed-loop cooling requirements.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:23:21 →
OpposedTodd SmithOct 27, 2026

Said the county is passing the political buck to the city and urged a pause until state guidelines, zoning definitions, and firm protections are in place.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:26:46 →
ConcernedMegan PittsOct 27, 2026

A mother near the site raised concerns about children and elderly residents, nearby schools, and whether IMU zoning offers adequate protections.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:33:26 →
NeutralArthur LaRueOct 27, 2026

Questioned the developers' data-center disclaimers and hoped the decision isn't just binary annex-or-lose-revenue.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:37:06 →
OpposedElena MoraOct 27, 2026

A Hager's Crossing resident already suffering light trespass demanded binding covenants banning data centers, noise caps, buffers, and developer-funded utilities.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:39:05 →
OpposedRobin Diver SmallOct 27, 2026

A 25-year IT veteran said data center operations jobs go overseas, not local, and called the annexation a loophole around the county moratorium.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:42:37 →
SupportiveRodney RiceOct 27, 2026

IBW electrical workers representative supported the annexation, citing financial stability and family benefits from industrial construction work.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:45:51 →
SupportiveDanny CessnaOct 27, 2026

An iron worker urged support, saying these are family-sustaining careers, not just temporary construction jobs.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:47:27 →
OpposedSally RamirezOct 27, 2026

An 84-year-old resident asked why elected officials sign NDAs and what good a data center really does, and requested a public forum to get answers.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:50:37 →
OpposedKathleen ThompsonOct 27, 2026

A geologist warned of sinkhole-prone karst geology, PFOS contamination risk from cooling water, and asked for binding groundwater testing conditions before any annexation.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:54:18 →
OpposedBrandon ThompsonOct 27, 2026

Opposed the annexation without a named end user and suggested the city ban data centers above 10 megawatts like Baltimore did.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 2:58:31 →
SupportiveKelly SchultzOct 27, 2026

The Maryland Tech Council CEO defended the economic study: 4,000+ construction jobs, 256 permanent jobs, $7.1M annual city tax revenue, amid state budget deficits.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:01:09 →
OpposedDalton LeeOct 27, 2026

A Rapid Response member pointed out the developer's own portfolio mentions a Washington County data center project, and demanded the city release its NDA with the developer.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:05:44 →
ConcernedSonia ChapelierOct 27, 2026

Asked whether the city can actually guarantee no data center and no tax breaks, questioned water sourcing, and disputed the developer's size comparisons.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:08:26 →
OpposedMark PrindleOct 27, 2026

Walked through the grid math: the 138 kV lines cap the data center, and future expansion would mean gas turbines and pollution like Memphis.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:12:21 →
OpposedNancy AllenOct 27, 2026

A realtor who believes the developer turned to the city only after the county said no; urged responsible evaluation of health, environmental, and property value impacts.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:16:16 →
OpposedLaura MalvinOct 27, 2026

An educator described the valley's migratory bird flyway and waterways, urging the council to draw the line on development; said workers deserve better than extractive industries.

| Mayor & Council: Regular Session — October 27, 2026 · 3:19:38 →